Causes of Conflict
1. Assumptions
It is essential to avoid assuming or telling someone else how they feel before they have had the opportunity to express themselves. This type of behavior typically leads to negative reactions because the chances are that your assumptions are incorrect. It is essential to understand that there may be multiple interpretations of someone’s actions. For instance, if a man is shouting, he could be angry, upset, physically hurt, or overjoyed. You cannot be entirely sure until he communicates what is going on.
To prevent unintentionally using this toxic behavior, separate facts from your opinion about the other person. Maintain a neutral tone and describe what you are observing while providing the other person with an opportunity to correct any errors in the interpretation of the facts. Instead of using loaded terms like “shouting” or saying “I know you’re angry,” which can cause an argument to escalate, use phrases such as “This conversation is getting louder. How are you feeling?”
For example, rather than telling someone that they are repeating themselves, which can be patronizing, use language such as “I have heard the same thing three times, and I’m still not understanding. Can you explain what you mean in a different way?” This approach lets the other person validate that you’ve correctly understood how they are feeling.
Once the other person confirms that you understand their feelings (such as anger), you can empathize with them. Phrases like “I too would be angry in your position” or “I genuinely understand why you don’t feel heard” can create a stronger connection instead of encouraging hostility.
2. Generalizing
Under the influence of a particular venom, you become all-knowing and generalize everything. You may insist that others never listen and that nothing ever gets done on-time. People who generalize pride themselves on their clear rules and black and white thinking.
However, those who see things in shades of gray are more open to new ideas, better problem solvers, and have stronger relationships.
A study by Alistair Ostell and Susan Oakland found that absolutism is inversely correlated with wisdom. The study involved eighty teachers classified as either “absolutist” or “non-absolutist” in their approach towards two work problems. Results showed that the absolutist teachers perceived themselves as less effective at managing their emotions and handling problems. They also had poorer mental and physical health, and found their jobs less pleasant than the open-minded and flexible non-absolutist teachers. The non-absolutist teachers reported finding problem-solving easier and experienced better health.
It is inaccurate to make sweeping generalizations as exceptions always exist. Even an employee who may be consistently tardy may occasionally meet a deadline. Engaging in this type of communication can be problematic as it may cause conflict when someone counters with their own experience. The use of absolutes like “always,” “never,” and “every,” in combination with terms like “you,” may exacerbate the situation further. Examples of this language include phrases like “You always know best,” “You never take my advice,” and “Typical of you to forget something.” Utilizing this type of communication can be counterproductive to positive outcomes and may create unnecessary tension.
In the event that someone employs such a toxic tactic against you, it is imperative not to indulge in a similar mindset. Instead, one must identify their sweeping statements as an isolated expression of anger. It is advisable to refrain from engaging with any inciteful remarks and envision them as arrows that miss their intended target, falling harmlessly a few feet away.
Subsequently, the discussion must be redirected to the relevant issue at hand. One may reiterate the importance of resolving the specific matter first, saying, “While there may be broader implications to your statements, can we direct our attention to finding a resolution?”. Alternatively, asking for their input on the next course of action, “Thank you for your insight. What do you suggest we do next to address this matter?”. Redirecting the conversation to the stated objective can help steer the interaction away from diversion and maintain productivity.